Showing posts with label Ghost the Musical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ghost the Musical. Show all posts

Thursday, January 16, 2014

'Ghost' Isn't Quite Ghastly, but I Still Say "Boo" -- Chicago Theater Review

Theater Review

Ghost: the Musical
Oriental Theatre, Chicago
Thru January 19
@@

It's like deja boo all over again.

In the fall of 2011, I did a stint as a proofreader at a downtown Chicago ad agency specializing in retail sales circulars. When the assignment ended at Thanksgiving, I took advantage of my friend Paolo having been sent to London for work and put up in a corporate flat he said I could share.

So thanks also to my frequent flyer miles, I went to London (and also Paris) on the cheap, and while Paolo's days were spent working, at night we frequented West End theaters. We saw Michael Jackson's Thriller Live, Priscilla: Queen of the Desert and Ghost: The Musical.

At the time, Ghost was rather new in London—and yet to arrive on Broadway for an abbreviated run—and while the reviews I saw weren't glowing, they also weren't quite awful.

I can't say either Paolo or I were devotees of the movie Ghost, starring Patrick Swayze and Demi Moore, but it was a rather popular and somewhat storied film. So although there was another new musical in London—Matilda—that was garnering great reviews, the allure of the movie and seemingly passable reviews led us to buy discount TKTS for Ghost on what was my last night in London.

As soon as the lights came up for intermission, Paolo turned to me and said, “This is the worst musical I've ever seen.”

I couldn't disagree.

Cut to January 2014. For the last several months, I have been working at the same ad agency I was at in
late 2011. It is again a freelance proofreading stint, but has lasted a bit longer this time. And on Wednesday night, Paolo and I (and our friend Sarah) again saw Ghost, as a national tour of the poorly reviewed and quickly shuttered Broadway version.

Photo credits: Joan Marcus
And at intermission, Paolo turned to me and said, "This is still the worst musical I've ever seen." 

To be fair, although I can't readily think of a musical I thought was worse—perhaps Blood Brothers, which both Paolo and I despised on separate viewings in London—neither he, Sarah or I felt Ghost was unwatchable, leave-at-intermission bad.

It is a lousy musical, and all the more disappointing due to the pedigree of its creatives—Ghost movie screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin wrote the book and some lyrics; the music & lyrics are credited to Dave Stewart of the Eurythmics and schmaltz-pop tunesmith Glen Ballard; the show has been directed since its London debut by noted British director Matthew Warchus, whose credits include the wondrous Matilda, which I saw while in London in 2013—but in an acute sense, Ghost wasn't awful to the point of making me angry.

There is no real depth or soul to any of the material onstage, but the performances from the non-Equity touring cast at Chicago's glorious Oriental Theatre were earnest, if not exceptional.

Katie Postotnik who plays Molly, the Demi Moore role from the film, is rather attractive and likable, and while her voice doesn't quite seem to have the tenor and timbre of a Broadway star, the songs she is given to sing don't do her vocals any favors.

In a show where the songwriting largely seems facile, the worst culprits are probably Molly's solo numbers. It's a shame that Stewart (who helped pen "Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This)" and other Eurythmics hits) and Ballard (co-writer of such hits as “Man in the Mirror” for Michael Jackson, “Hold On” for Wilson Phillips and “You Oughta Know” for Alanis Morrissette) couldn't produce more distinctive songs about sorrow and perseverance than the bland “With You” and “Nothing Stops Another Day,” respectively.

I would suggest that on some subversive evening, Postotnik substitute the Sondheim chestnuts “Losing My Mind” and “Not a Day Goes By” for the two tunes mentioned above, if only to see how it feels to sing songs that insightfully convey emotions, rather than merely reference them.

Complementing Postotnik is Steven Grant Douglas, sufficient but nothing special as Sam, the Patrick Swayze character. Granted, I was sitting way up in the balcony, but he didn't seem to bring anything distinctive to the role.

Nor for that matter did Robby Haltiwanger as his friend, Carl, who—well, I won't ruin a 24-year-old movie or even its miserly stage musical. But his smarm seemed to be lacking the proper amount of pretentious slickness.

As psychic Otta Mae Brown, the role that won Whoopi Goldberg an Oscar, Carla R. Stewart is rather fun, though pretty much acts exactly as you'd expect her too and veers to the edge of racist caricature. But if her songs were a bit better, she could really be the standout in this show.

Which is kind of like being the prize winning Shar Pei in an ugly dog contest.

But while Ghost the Musical is pretty much a dog of a show—and this review is actually kind compared to the bashing Chris Jones bestowed in the Chicago Tribune—it does have some interesting new tricks.

Echoing the world premiere London production, this version of Ghost uses more videography than any
musical I've seen, largely to establish scenery on the streets and subways of New York City.

Though at times, the video backdrops seem cheesy—and cheapen the experience of seeing live theater in a large downtown venue for up to $100 for prime seats; fortunately as subscribers, we paid about a tenth of that—but there were times when the videography was rather ingenious, particularly when it evoked a New York subway car in motion.

So while I wouldn't really recommend it to anyone—even readily-available discount tickets on HotTix will set you back over $50 including fees—Ghost isn't a complete abomination from beginning to end; it's just subpar, with even the movie's famed pottery scene being oddly short-circuited.

But the non-Equity touring cast doesn't make the show seem any worse than I recall it in London, and there's certainly nothing about the efforts of anyone onstage that I would criticize.

It's not even impossible to perceive that occasional theatergoers with non-discriminating tastes might even adequately enjoy Ghost the Musical (though I also imagine those who love the movie might not want to mess with their recollect).

But as for Paolo and me, we're still haunted.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

In the Spirit of Critical Congruency, Noting the Negativity about 'Ghost the Musical' on Broadway

(Note: This is not a review; I have not seen Ghost in New York, though I did see it in London)

As I hopefully make rather evident in my writings on this blog, I have tremendous regard and respect for the arts--and anyone who participates in them at any level.

So although I enjoy giving an honest appraisal of shows I see--and as I am not a professional critic, I actually pay to see them and am not compensated in any way for my reviews--I don't revel in being negative, nor nasty, about shows I don't like.

Even at the low level of reach and influence that Seth Saith enjoys, writing something unkind about a performance, and especially performers, would be to insult people who are far more theatrically, or musically, etc., talented than I'll ever be.

And bad professional reviews, particularly by New York theater critics about new Broadway shows, have caused many a show to close much earlier than planned. While this can be seen as a public service in saving audiences considerable money and time in seeing dreck, it also can cost many an actor, musician, stagehand, souvenir seller and ticket taker their source of income.

So I'm not hoping that Ghost the Musical closes quickly on Broadway in the wake of mostly scathing reviews after opening last night at the Lunt-Fontanne Theatre in New York. But based on having found the show quite lousy when I saw it in London in late November with the same lead actors, I didn't feel it merited a Broadway production (unless the producers tremendously improved it).

Though I accept that my opinion of musicals, plays, concerts, movies, etc. may often differ from those offered by professional critics, I respect the judgments of theater writers like Chris Jones of the Chicago Tribune and Hedy Weiss of the Chicago Sun-Times enough to really wonder why they might have loved something I didn't (such as with Camino Real at the Goodman Theater; I found it almost unwatchable--as did many audience members who left early--yet Jones raved about it).

Thus, even as the half-assed critic that I pretend to be, or even just as an avid theater lover, I'm often quite curious about how Chicago and New York critics will review a show, particularly one I really loved or hated. I still recall how, after catching a pre-Broadway production of Hairspray in Seattle in 2003, I told my mom that it would win the Tony for Best Musical. And I felt appraisingly validated when it did (after garnering great reviews upon opening on Broadway).

Now, as proof that critical reviews don't always matter much to audiences, when in London last November with my friend Paolo, we opted to see Ghost--with half-price TKTS, mind you--despite it getting middling notices from the London critics. The show, based on the popular 1990 movie, had opened in July 2011 and is still running in London, so a cherished title can supersede negative reviews, and did so even in my case.

But by intermission, Paolo and I were in accordance that what we were watching just wasn't very good. Despite being written by Bruce Joel Rubin, who also wrote the movie that we both recalled favorably, the story and dialogue were hokey and shallow. And even with music by Dave Stewart (of the Eurythmics) and successful pop songwriter Glen Ballard, few of the songs could even be termed tuneful, let alone memorable.

It took me awhile to post a review here, but within a recap of my London/Paris trip, I gave it @@ out of 5. I called it "pretty darn awful," but didn't waste a lot of space ragging on it. Especially as much of what made it subpar was in its tone, and thus difficult to expound upon. I also didn't expect many Americans to have a chance to see it anytime soon; though in theory the Hollywood-to-Broadway (via London) transfer seemed a natural, the show itself just seemed too slight to survive the New York press.

So when I noted shortly thereafter that Ghost the Musical would open on Broadway in April, I was rather shocked. Yes, popular movies turned into musicals have long sold tickets on name alone, but usually it takes their being rather good to really have legs (and thus recoup the investment): The Producers and Hairspray being prime examples, High Fidelity and 9-to-5 the opposite and Young Frankenstein and Shrek having fairly good but not fantastic runs despite mediocre reviews.

While the creative team of Ghost may have been pleased with the box office take in London, the lukewarm press had to be concerning.

The leads in London, Caissie Levy (Molly) and Richard Fleeshman (Sam)--who have reprised their roles on Broadway--were attractive and not completely unappealing, and noting above the trickle-down economics of a Broadway show, I wish the enterprise well. But I'm not eagerly anticipating the day, about three years from now, when Ghost shows up on my Broadway in Chicago subscription series.

And thus, when I awoke this morning and saw reviews that said things such as:
"[Ghost] may not be the very worst musical ever made from a movie. ... But it is just as flavorless and lacking in dramatic vitality as many that have come before."
-- Charles Isherwood, New York Times

"This musical suffers from a jerky tone and by putting a premium on high-tech over heart."
-- Joe Dziemianowicz, New York Daily News
"The turgid score doesn’t boast a single decent hook."
-- Elizabeth Vincentelli, New York Post

"There is so much wrong with "Ghost," it's hard to know where to start."
-- Chris Jones, Chicago Tribune
...well, I can't say that I was surprised.

Still, box office receipts for Ghost on Broadway have looked solid during its preview weeks--although anyone so inclined in or heading to NYC should be able to find discounts at the TKTS booth or ahead of time through Broadway Box--so perhaps it will have a long and spirited run, after all.